From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  6 23:30:34 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FBF106566C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Jun 2008 23:30:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from agaviola@infoweapons.com)
Received: from infoweapons.com (mail0.infoweapons.com [204.2.248.50])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDD08FC26
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Fri,  6 Jun 2008 23:30:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from agaviola@infoweapons.com)
Received: from ([58.71.34.138])
	by mail0.infoweapons.com with ESMTP with TLS id 4321444.282173;
	Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:30:07 -0400
Message-ID: <4849C87F.9030804@infoweapons.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 07:30:07 +0800
From: "Archimedes S. Gaviola" <agaviola@infoweapons.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Removal of mrouted in FreeBSD-7.0]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:30:34 -0000

To Whom It May Concerned:

Hi! I have just read from the FreeBSD-7.0 release notes 
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/relnotes.html that the mrouted 
multicast routing protocol (DVMRP implementation) has been removed from 
the base system. I want to know what multicast routing protocol will 
served as replacement to this? The KAME snap kit have PIM-SM and PIM-DM 
implementations but are specific only to IPv6.

Thanks,

Archimedes