From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Nov 15 08:39:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA16899 for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 08:39:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA16892; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 08:39:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA11798; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 17:37:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Evan Champion cc: ac199@hwcn.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/5050: upgrade perl In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 15 Nov 1997 10:46:04 EST." Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 17:37:22 +0100 Message-ID: <11796.879611842@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Evan Cha mpion writes: >On Sat, 15 Nov 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > >> No. This bugreport should include the proper bmake style >> makefiles, and any other changes, removals, etc. that would be >> necessary for perl5 before it goes into the main system. >> >> Same goes for the previous Tcl upgrade and bind upgrade requests >> you sent. > >I just report the problem. Am I supposed to do everything? If I was >interested in doing that I'd get CVS update access and do it myself. Uhm, actually: yes. The FreeBSD effort to a large extent works because people submit substance, not just requests for it. So, why not give a hand ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."