Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 29 Jul 1997 10:25:45 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Robert Watson <robert@cyrus.watson.org>
Cc:        security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Detecting sniffers (was: Re: security hole in FreeBSD) 
Message-ID:  <E0wtF5l-0006nV-00@rover.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Jul 1997 21:59:39 EDT." <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970728215803.4839A-100000@cyrus.watson.org> 
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970728215803.4839A-100000@cyrus.watson.org>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970728215803.4839A-100000@cyrus.watson.org> Robert Watson writes:
: host.  Promiscuous mode simply disables the filter.  The only way to
: prevent the packets from being sniffable is to prevent them from going on
: the wire in question -- smart hubs (switches) do this, so are desirable.

Well, there is strong encryption.  While it doesn't prevent sniff of
the packets, per se, it generally leaves you with garbage and produces
the same net effect.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wtF5l-0006nV-00>