Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:42:45 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> To: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/132615: [patch] x11/libX11: work aroung parsing bug in Bash 4.0 Message-ID: <j68WN2%2BMGVQ3uYtxFQb259rGF2A@z6rvab04C8MpQhZ/UqYvhU4fxRI> In-Reply-To: <1240605576.2142.47.camel@balrog.2hip.net> References: <200904242010.n3OKA41e084949@freefall.freebsd.org> <1240605576.2142.47.camel@balrog.2hip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert, good day. Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:39:36PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > Well, I don't actually know anything about dolt... Here is the announcement for DOLT: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2008-04/msg00001.html > but, yes this seems like it might be worthwhile. What do you > attribute the speedup to be from? Is dolt doing a parallel build, > while make is not? No, as you can see from the announcement, DOLT replaces libtool for the modern systems where you can create libraries in a few steps. Full-blown libtool works on every platform on the expense of its speed. DOLT minimizes the build time on the modern systems and falls back to libtool on the systems it cannot handle natively. So I am attributing the speedup to the DOLT itself -- it is just faster than libtool. -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ #
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?j68WN2%2BMGVQ3uYtxFQb259rGF2A>