From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 07:38:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A96A1065713 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017CD8FC1B for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 07:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 3125 invoked by uid 399); 4 Jan 2009 07:31:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 4 Jan 2009 07:31:23 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <496065CA.9070801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:31:22 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chin-San Huang , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200901030713.n037DlVN004766@repoman.freebsd.org> <495F47C0.6030505@FreeBSD.org> <20090103133436.GA33217@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <20090103133436.GA33217@graf.pompo.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/xpi-adblock Makefile ports/www/xpi-autobrowse Makefile ports/www/xpi-clearfields Makefile ports/www/xpi-colorfultabs Makefile ports/www/xpi-cssviewer Makefile ports/www/xpi-customizegoogle Makefile ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 07:38:04 -0000 Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le Sam 3 jan 09 à 12:10:56 +0100, Doug Barton > écrivait : >> Chin-San Huang wrote: >>> Log: >>> - Set DEPRECATED with my xpi-* ports at first. >>> They could installed and updated more easily by user's browser(firefox). >>> >>> - EXPIRATION_DATE on 2009-01-31 >> Out of curiosity, what benefit does deprecation provide in contrast >> with simply removing them? > > Hopefully someone (TM) will adopt them. This is not intended as a criticism, but why? Hasn't it been discussed (as you pointed out in your commit message above) that there is no reason for these ports to exist in our tree? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection