From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 17:24:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BEC88C; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1250F4; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DE641FE022; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:24:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54775E81.2070505@selasky.org> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:25:21 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd , Michael Tuexen Subject: Re: [RFC] Removal of M_FLOWID flag from m_flags [WAS: Add support for hardware transmit rate limiting queues] References: <546CE948.2070105@selasky.org> <546D0CE3.602@selasky.org> <54775B0E.3000004@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lawrence Stewart , FreeBSD Current , Luigi Rizzo , "K. Macy" , Navdeep Parhar X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:59 -0000 On 11/27/14 18:20, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 27 November 2014 at 09:18, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Erk - SCTP folk - are you using the mbuf flowid field for something >> SCTP specific? > > erk - yes, you are. > > It seems we're going to run into "what exactly should flowid be used > for" problems. > Hi, If the flowid has special meaning inside the SCTP, please define an own "rsstype" for it. As far as I could see, it is only used to spread the traffic on the network adapter and on the CPU cores. --HPS