From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 30 20:23:00 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1C91065672
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317FE200CC3;
	Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:22:59 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4D939123.5000605@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:22:59 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
References: <20110330154854.GA10523@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
	<K7hstDB+0Q@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <K7hstDB+0Q@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/graphics/netpbm out of date
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:23:00 -0000

On 3/30/2011 11:55 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Alex Kozlov schrieb:,
>
>> So why netpbm is 10.26.64 and graphics/netpbm-devel(??) is 10.35.80?
>
> Because this is the last released tarball.
>
> Later Version are only in Subversion.

The way this has traditionally been handled is for the maintainer to 
create a tarball from a known-good point.

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/