From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 16 03:15:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76D516A400; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:15:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from natial.ongs.co.jp (natial.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5797743D45; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:15:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daichi@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (dullmdaler.ongs.co.jp [202.216.232.62]) by natial.ongs.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBD2244C19; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:15:24 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4418D84B.6090005@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:15:23 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mars G. Miro" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp References: <28edec3c0603151829r7ff125f8m3dfb8c194d0731b7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <28edec3c0603151829r7ff125f8m3dfb8c194d0731b7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: daichi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:15:25 -0000 Mars G. Miro wrote: > Daichi-san, > >> I have updated the patchset-9 of unionfs. >> > > We've been using an in-house LiveCD toolkit that uses unionfs (where > cd9660 is the lower layer) and all I can say is that these patches are > very important, at least on => 6.X, otherwise things would just not > work. I believe the FreeSBIE folks also went thru the same experience > as they also do this (cd9960 lower, unionfs upper). > > I have tried your p8-patchset diffs for about 2 weeks now and It Works > (TM). Will try your p9 diffs soon ;-) Good. > Will these diffs remain to be diffs or do people think that these will > be integrated into the sources sometime? It is depending on src committer's intentions. I am a ports committer. I want to merge it into -current and I think it is getting ripe for integrating into -current. The patchset-9 already has enough quality for merge. All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi