From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  9 00:30:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A7716A4CE
	for <java@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 00:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ib.com.ua (ib.com.ua [217.144.67.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020C043D45
	for <java@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 00:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tech@ib.com.ua)
Received: from ib.com.ua (localhost.ib.com.ua [127.0.0.1])
	by ib.com.ua (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i397TSPX006315;
	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:29:28 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from tech@ib.com.ua)
Received: (from tech@localhost)
	by ib.com.ua (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i397TS2r006314;
	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:29:28 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from tech)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:29:28 +0300 (EEST)
From: tech <tech@ib.com.ua>
Message-Id: <200404090729.i397TS2r006314@ib.com.ua>
To: herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr, java@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20040409064800.GB43513@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
Subject: Re: [ports-i386@bento.FreeBSD.org: jakarta-commons-dbcp-1.1 failed
	on i386 4]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 07:30:06 -0000

>
> Anyway, I can send a fix for that if you want but we have two options
> here:
>
> - Update Makefile to enforce the use of JDK 1.4 (JAVA_VERSION=1.4+)
>   which is bad as JDK 1.2/1.3 users should be able to use it anyway.
> - Switch to a binary port (NO_BUILD=yes) which is bad for many ethic
>   reasons (debated in many occasions by many people).
>
> Up to the maintainer...
>
> Herve
>

I consider first method is better ...