From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Feb 2 02:13:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA19826 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 02:13:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA19821 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 02:13:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id LAA50751; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:12:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , W Gerald Hicks , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lets Endorse KDE Was: some slashdot thread References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 02 Feb 1999 11:12:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Jason C. Wells"'s message of "Tue, 2 Feb 1999 04:21:06 +0000 (GMT)" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jason C. Wells" writes: > My idea for calling for KDE is that it can be done AS IS. To require work > and customization destroys my whole argument and takes us right back to > programming some sort of custom work intensive desktop. This would have to > pull developers off tech issues and would therefore be harder to support. Well, the least we can do is throw in a BSD daemon graphic somewhere on the desktop, so people don't accidentally believe they're running Linux 8) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message