Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:42:45 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Devin Teske <dteske@vicor.com> Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl>, krad <kraduk@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Modulok <modulok@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Is ZFS ready for prime time? Message-ID: <AANLkTikJ1h18%2ByN9kmW4HUiPhs86Z8F%2BOKU=f1DD2S5=@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1289851856.14522.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <AANLkTikCnCHF3wa257LejpHdW-%2BSH49_FgwmegwOFS2c@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011150927020.32766@tensor.gdynia.pl> <AANLkTimTzAoUO-9NqW6vcePU2CMUo-on0x=gOEaU%2BkZu@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011152032030.78383@tensor.gdynia.pl> <1289851856.14522.41.camel@localhost.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Devin Teske <dteske@vicor.com> wrote: > Sounds like FUD. > > Like the OP, I too am interested in the current state of ZFS. We've been > following the threads as far as build 28, and I do indeed see positive > improvement and continued development. However, is anyone that is > actively involved in the project able to provide a snapshot opinion of > the production readiness of ZFS for enterprise deployment? > > If the opinion is that ZFS is not ready for production, are there any > technical explanations as to the efficacy or lack thereof rather than > the above philosophical FUD which implores the OP to pour over massive > archives (which can paint an inverse picture because the archives are > usually filled with a higher number of issues than success stories -- > which is true of nearly ANY mailing-list)? > You'll need to go over to freebsd-fs@ if you want a technical discussion. All you'll get here is meaningless opinionated philosophical gibber with little to no basis in reality. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikJ1h18%2ByN9kmW4HUiPhs86Z8F%2BOKU=f1DD2S5=>