From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Apr 18 14:57:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4ACD4221B for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8C21A76 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DEEA4D42217; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC16D42216; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 993691A73; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id h67so132456000qke.0; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:57:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Lg4lR8VmEXhgr6IKa9x8zeZci+GutT/YF47PM9eq48E=; b=T1/01pWEa1JaZcbfIqhov8kEueS+8JXxYeZbuntQBvvIpCrJKD2frC0ZiP7q6FkBph ydazXhl++ZOGbTKLDBWFKmZab/fuMzoRKhK0t6Nt9IxjB9YNDfR7RuOv1D4tXBTXBKYG wkqrg7k61yYVekWzINNAn4jZ4S2+/lpmAiFuHtP6jNdxdTwmbK0uNaJz6m6Jno/UHBtq mk9n9eBL4T5KIiyOpUMRSqbpC9+BY62HOcDX6rSvme7KCCONlK6o8kALO/POXOaOeKRw ABVCqZow6mmispdOd8n91cFTI3ddWWDW17g6rT6lCWrrgE2pmYcPZMiD/QBDS7SyP5qZ QfKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lg4lR8VmEXhgr6IKa9x8zeZci+GutT/YF47PM9eq48E=; b=Nchw1QWI9D5BXH3nZFhwTY3i1M2Ho+Br2X8KGfLXy3SM8NUznxTRu/4dR7XC3Gobtt TeZKihJxDQJBo44GUSPw02S/fNZvb5LHrc0BjRc9V+1n6LT9F4O6DyKXbafVOQYKqM98 /IPEi+zN6zTbO4pjfeoTdtBI2AsgnAQ1xEVZrBQUQ18+Wi4pATMKJukXJ5QlmoJdQ3hs hnmrCgZ04Ro2nweRn+KZ3cc1/TRBJxdH67HlQIYXQptOUB2DIfnSJa6WFp4wLXd+OpNL P3W1ErWHAHxe2VORsAVr5KlzuY+K+Snzi2+gZ7KpKcOInrpmoW729ZRfX+gXBxN0HiiV O9ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4yvnLimXf2e3XTzuoA+1tzaeyT0gX0XWFLG8Y2jutsOChWGnmy IreqVy2DSWQxYoiJOm1Ozp90e4O+8Q== X-Received: by 10.55.187.132 with SMTP id l126mr12663167qkf.236.1492527422594; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:57:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.183.158 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:57:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <58F61A8D.1030309@a1poweruser.com> References: <58F61A8D.1030309@a1poweruser.com> From: krad Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:57:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is pkg quarterly really needed? To: qjail1 Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , FreeBSD questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:57:04 -0000 quarterly does seem very cautious, maybe a monthly might be a good alternative. I can understand people being hesitant about latest though. I guess these are not the people who ask though. Maybe the real answer though is to have a specific repo for that port for the bleeding edge people much like launchpad on ubuntu. It might get complicated though for big dependency trees though. On 18 April 2017 at 14:54, qjail1 wrote: > I maintain a port and I have users complaining that the pkg system takes > many months before the updated version of my port shows up in the pkg > system. > > My response is I tell them to change a line in their /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf > file > from url: "pkg+http://pkg.Freebsd.org/${ABI}/quarterly", > to url: "pkg+http://pkg.Freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest", > > The old pkg system never had this quarterly update cycle and I see no > reason to have it now when its so easy to over ride the default. > > Why not just change the default to "latest" and save on all the overhead > of the quarterly cycle? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe > @freebsd.org" >