From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 10 01:36:20 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FBD1065672
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:36:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sunner.semmy.ru (sunner.semmy.ru [195.54.209.159])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214408FC1B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:36:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [109.173.73.7] (helo=[172.16.100.23])
	by sunner.semmy.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <sem@FreeBSD.org>)
	id 1OMWgr-000FfA-BF; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:36:17 +0400
Message-ID: <4C104191.3060408@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:36:17 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>
References: <4E3C5EC96AEE55AE692F0276@utd65257.utdallas.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4E3C5EC96AEE55AE692F0276@utd65257.utdallas.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Can someone explain this? (portupgrade of
	textproc/p5-Perl-Critic
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:36:20 -0000

09.06.2010 19:54, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> First it checks for prereqs and finds them all. Then it checks for
> prereqs and says they're missing. Then it generates three stops due to
> errors, and at the end it says the upgrade was successful??? WTF???
>
> And it *is not* installed. I'm still working to get all the prereqs
> installed, even though they already were. What exactly is the problem
> with this port?
>

Unfortunately sometimes portupgrade can't detect some failures (failures 
for portupgrade is any output to stderr). As I can remember it has 
happened after one of ruby updates. I could not find a reason for this 
behaviour.

-- 
Semy.