Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:40:02 +0100 From: Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: Helmut Schneider <jumper99@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bump of PORTREVISION mandatory? Message-ID: <404D2B5E-52BA-4773-AC53-01D3D347725A@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0538W1ig3nzML2kdUbFpHhCpbKmeV6gdcRwA1@mail.gmail.com> References: <xn0h9mifqj6hya003@news.gmane.org> <AANLkTim0538W1ig3nzML2kdUbFpHhCpbKmeV6gdcRwA1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-4-33222737 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 27, 2011, at 18:47, Scot Hetzel wrote: > There is not need to bump PORTREVISION for simple changes. The only > time a PORTREVISION bump is required is when it fixes a security > problem, or when a library the port depends on changes. Not entirely true. Please see = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.htm= l#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org> --Apple-Mail-4-33222737 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk1B9EIACgkQv+Q4flTiePhSbgCgjnbtcWMc17sf2Yc6whJxot6X fYEAniEhZjpyHGnM5nBREutOJDbCPXFk =pSw7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-4-33222737--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?404D2B5E-52BA-4773-AC53-01D3D347725A>