Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:39:15 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intra-jail communication slow Message-ID: <B4A963A9-01CD-4F9D-9BFF-5BF6124A77A6@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <CAPSTsksQ7H54TFA2Dd=Hpe0B9MxNCLnd6p8zn4LApGFK5u-F1Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPSTsksQ7H54TFA2Dd=Hpe0B9MxNCLnd6p8zn4LApGFK5u-F1Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15. Apr 2012, at 19:28 , Beeblebrox wrote: > I would like to know if this is normal for jails: > 1. 3 different Jails for mysql , http, tinderbox. > 2. No pf / nat running for the time being > 3. My ifconfig for jails: > inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 > (tinderbox, dhcp, tftp) > inet 192.168.2.100 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.2.100 = (http) > inet 192.168.2.101 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.2.101 = (mysql) >=20 > Problem: Jails seem to be communicating with host and with each-other > at an observably slower rate, compared to when all services are > host-based. Which communications and how much slower? > Is this normal for jails or is my netconfig problematic in some way? In theory not, but in practise please notice that for example with mysql = you may switch from unix domain sockets (usually used in "localhost" = case) to normal inet socket communications etc. which may affect your = overall feeling of "speed". Knowing details and numbers etc might help here to rule out a jail = specific problem. /bz --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B4A963A9-01CD-4F9D-9BFF-5BF6124A77A6>