From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Aug 9 16:22:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB8537B405 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:22:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA03945; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:20:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010809171930.046e27a0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 17:20:42 -0600 To: Mike Meyer , j mckitrick From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Why anti-trust law? Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <15218.65422.812160.575351@guru.mired.org> References: <20010809150404.C92172@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010809150404.C92172@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 03:24 PM 8/9/2001, Mike Meyer wrote: >I wouldn't, because I think they are generally a bad idea. I've as yet >to hear of an example where a corporate monopoly was broken up and the >public benefited. Four characters: AT&T. It's just a shame that they didn't break it up the right way, separating infrastructure from service. --Brett Glass To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message