Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:00:04 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not? Message-ID: <20020623140004.B79416@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <xzp6609zsbt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 09:51:50PM %2B0200 References: <20020621134520.G68827@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020621223209.GP76002@squall.waterspout.com> <xzp4rfv3bbb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020622200545.GS76002@squall.waterspout.com> <20020622204229.GG53232@elvis.mu.org> <xzpheju21z0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3D152EAA.DB201738@FreeBSD.org> <xzp660a16x9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3D162074.A636B067@FreeBSD.org> <xzp6609zsbt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 09:51:50PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> The long-term fix to allow people to upgrade painlessly from -STABLE
> to -CURRENT is to include -STABLE's PAM library and modules in
> compat4x. I've asked David to do this several times, with no success.
And I asked for some needed clarification, but never heard back.
Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 23:32:14 -0700
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>,
current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: xdm broken on current
..snip..
I guess I need clarification. Since PAM modules aren't versioned, is
there a problem? Or did you rename all the modules with OpenPAM?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020623140004.B79416>