Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 02:14:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Kris Kirby <kris@hiwaay.net> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Misuse of options BRIDGE? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10004140203520.6886-100000@barricuda.bsd.nws.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've got a machine I'm trying to use to break a /24 into a few smaller groups. I've got it options BRIDGE in the kernel, four ethernet cards (mx0, pn0, ed0, ed1), and need to figure out the right way to do this: I've got /24 on one side of the machine. I need a /27 (0-32) to be seen on both sides (the router is .1, the most of the machines I want to firewall are on .2-31). I have a NAS running from .33 to .190, and a /26 (192-255) for another subnet. The NAS and router are on the /24. The auth server, .6, needs to be able to communicate fairly directly with both the NAS (.10). I don't want the NAS behind the firewall. If it is, it will be on a seperate port. I'd tried running all three with a /24 netmask, but I still don't see packets getting forwarded. I do have the sysctl set to 1 for that. (aka gateway_enable="YES"). I'd apprecaite any input from the group.... Apoligize if I seem a little terse; it's late and I'm not all here.... ----- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. <kris@nospam.hiwaay.net> | ------------------------------------------------------- "God gave them the ability to reproduce... ... Science gave us the hope they won't." -KBK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10004140203520.6886-100000>