From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 06:28:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4AA16A4D4; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 06:28:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B7F43D45; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 06:28:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i15EScnJ025987; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:28:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 07:28:27 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20040205.072827.64789687.imp@bsdimp.com> To: ru@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040205091634.GC13932@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <20040205091634.GC13932@FreeBSD.org.ua> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: jmallett@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: bde@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Very long SRCS list with unusually long src/ prefix X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:28:54 -0000 This looks relatively good to me. It is a little cleaner than that patches that we have in our tree, which are slightly less efficient. We've not noticed any slowdown by using them. I think this is critical for 5.3 and we should put it in now. Warner