From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 11 01:09:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA03612 for current-outgoing; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 01:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.dk.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA03594; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 01:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.dk.tfs.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA01181; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:12:56 +0200 (CEST) To: dg@root.com cc: Garrett Wollman , Terry Lambert , current@FreeBSD.ORG From: phk@dk.tfs.com Subject: Re: WHY? ...non-use of TAILQ macros... In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:11:26 PDT." <199704110211.TAA01113@root.com> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:12:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1179.860742776@critter> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Actually it was Poul-Henning who added those and I don't recall >agreeing that I liked it. In fact, I recall thinking that it was >completely unnecessary, but I don't think I made any comment at the >time. Indeed, I started it, and I still have a bunch of patches, which I promised not to commit until after the LITE2 merge. I think that is a weird inconsistent mess without them, and I see no reason why we would want to hide half of the implementation behind macros, but not the other half. I fully intend to complete the migration btw. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.