Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:12:56 +0200 From: phk@dk.tfs.com To: dg@root.com Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WHY? ...non-use of TAILQ macros... Message-ID: <1179.860742776@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:11:26 PDT." <199704110211.TAA01113@root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Actually it was Poul-Henning who added those and I don't recall >agreeing that I liked it. In fact, I recall thinking that it was >completely unnecessary, but I don't think I made any comment at the >time. Indeed, I started it, and I still have a bunch of patches, which I promised not to commit until after the LITE2 merge. I think that <sys/queue.h> is a weird inconsistent mess without them, and I see no reason why we would want to hide half of the implementation behind macros, but not the other half. I fully intend to complete the migration btw. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1179.860742776>