Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 16:11:34 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz.freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r317205 - in head/graphics: ecore-evas evas-engine-opengl evas-engine-sdl Message-ID: <20130503141134.GD12114@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CADLFttfJkquXYBq%2BfCY095hOgBaMmL%2B4vZpv0bKT2hUNwuvnMQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201305031333.r43DXmYd075222@svn.freebsd.org> <CADLFttfJkquXYBq%2BfCY095hOgBaMmL%2B4vZpv0bKT2hUNwuvnMQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:53:00AM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wro= te: > > Author: bapt > > Date: Fri May 3 13:33:48 2013 > > New Revision: 317205 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/317205 > > > > Log: > > Fix build with bmake by using gmake if make is bmake >=20 > I am not very fond of those change. If we are going to switch to > bmake. Why not just simply add USE_GMAKE without that ugly .PARSEDIR? Because it would be intrusive, I will let the maintainer see what he wants = to do. I'm just adding support for bmake with the less possible modification of wh= at maintainer did in the first place, after that the maintainer is up to decide what he wants to do. regards, Bapt --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlGDxZYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez34QCeM8rfk2w0CMZb8q51gN7CBLTb WRQAniVBmRMoUiEUCxhTXppP7OWHtQH8 =6Pcs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130503141134.GD12114>