From owner-freebsd-security Mon Mar 4 5:25:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AD737B400 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 05:25:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0847AA809; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:25:31 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F65426; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:25:31 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 00:25:30 +1100 (EST) From: Andrew To: Fernando Schapachnik Cc: bms@spc.org, Subject: Re: DES differences between Solaris and FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20020304095830.B69238@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> Message-ID: <20020305002231.P7149-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Fernando Schapachnik wrote: > When I migrated from Solaris 2.5.1 to FreeBSD 4.1 I use the same > hashes straight from Solaris /etc/shadow and I had no problem. Thanks for the mail. With the help of David Wolfskill I have worked it out...we had users with invalid characters in their crypted passwords. The passwords probably haven't been changed in many years and Solaris accepts them but FreeBSD doesn't. Thanks for all your help, Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message