From owner-cvs-all Mon Feb 17 2:35:56 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B0237B401; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 02:35:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFFF43F85; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 02:35:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with ESMTP id <2003021710355105100hi29ee>; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:35:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA11135; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 02:35:51 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200302171035.CAA11135@InterJet.elischer.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 02:35:49 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Scott Long Cc: Julian Elischer , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha exception.s genassym.c Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG src/sys/i386/i386 exception.s genassym.c sys_machdep.c src/sys/i386/isa npx.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 exception.s genassym.c src/sys/kern kern_clock.c kern_intr.c kern_sig.c kern_switch.c ... In-Reply-To: <3E50B51F.1050803@btc.adaptec.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII It was compiled and run on alpha it was compiled and run on x86 UP and compiled on X86 SMP It was seen to run on most of these the last time it was commited as well before the drive-by backout. Jake supplied the sparc assembler diff. It is probably 'suboptimal' for ia64 (at least the ia64 assembler diff is prabably not making correct use of ia64 grouping, but I think it should work).. it does at least compile. (well it does since I checked in a missing patch) I left a patch on pluto1 and forgot to bring it back to my checkin tree, but I found it withing a few minites. in post checkin testing. why do you ask? On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Scott Long wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > julian 2003/02/17 01:55:10 PST > > > > Modified files: > > sys/alpha/alpha exception.s genassym.c > > sys/i386/i386 exception.s genassym.c sys_machdep.c > > sys/i386/isa npx.c > > sys/ia64/ia64 exception.s genassym.c > > sys/kern kern_clock.c kern_intr.c kern_sig.c > > kern_switch.c kern_synch.c kern_thread.c > > sched_4bsd.c sched_ule.c subr_prof.c > > subr_smp.c subr_trap.c > > sys/posix4 ksched.c > > sys/powerpc/powerpc genassym.c > > sys/security/mac_lomac mac_lomac.c > > sys/sparc64/sparc64 exception.S genassym.c > > sys/sys proc.h resourcevar.h > > Log: > > Move a bunch of flags from the KSE to the thread. > > I was in two minds as to where to put them in the first case.. > > I should have listenned to the other mind. > > > > Submitted by: parts by davidxu@ > > Reviewed by: jeff@ mini@ > > > > > Julian, > > I appreciate the progress that is being made here, but I'm wondering > if this was tested on sparc64 or alpha, and if jake, tmm, and/or drew > were allowed to review it. Can you clarify this? > > Scott > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message