Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:01:34 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stupid xfce clock question Message-ID: <874p3pstz5.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <48EA126C.6040407@gmail.com> (Aryeh M. Friedman's message of "Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:28:12 -0400") References: <48E9CEB8.4090406@gmail.com> <87skrahrqm.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081006115208.GB19442@icarus.home.lan> <48EA126C.6040407@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:28:12 -0400, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If you are using XFCE4 then you are reaping all the benefits of the >>> freely available work of others. This style of subject is offensive >>> to their efforts to provide a light-weight, beautiful, functional >>> and fast performing desktop environment in a multitude of UNIX >>> platforms. >>> >>> Please consider using a less confrontational style for posting >>> questions in the future. >> >> It depends on how you read it. I read the Subject line to mean "I'm >> asking a stupid question", not "xfce is stupid". I'm pretty sure >> Aryeh meant the lesser, not the latter. > > Just for clarity thats what I meant... I use it specifically because it > is the best desktop out there and has not made the same mistakes gnome > and/or kde did (the only complaint I have is it your be nice if the > desktop would updat7e it self as you change the contents of ~/Desktop) Ok, an apology from me is in order then. My non-native English failed to parse the subject correctly, sorry about that :-/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?874p3pstz5.fsf>