From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 11:06:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FB916A4D8 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:06:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Danovitsch@vitsch.net) Received: from amsfep11-int.chello.nl (amsfep17-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8209543D6B for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Danovitsch@vitsch.net) Received: from Tuinhuisje.Vitsch.net ([62.195.87.223]) by amsfep11-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with ESMTP id <20060703110625.TZAK23376.amsfep11-int.chello.nl@Tuinhuisje.Vitsch.net>; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:06:25 +0200 Received: from [192.168.87.6] (f23025.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.23.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by Tuinhuisje.Vitsch.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k63B6BxE051580; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:06:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Danovitsch@vitsch.net) From: "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" Organization: Vitsch Electronics To: nocturnal Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:06:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <44A8D770.5060808@swehack.se> <200607031157.58675.Danovitsch@vitsch.net> <44A8F0D6.4060307@swehack.se> In-Reply-To: <44A8F0D6.4060307@swehack.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607031306.12477.Danovitsch@vitsch.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interrupt using all the CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 11:06:32 -0000 On Monday 03 July 2006 12:26, nocturnal wrote: > Hi > > The clock? > > interrupt total rate > irq0: clk 25130235 99 > irq1: atkbd0 4 0 > irq6: fdc0 1 0 > irq7: ppc0 1 0 > irq8: rtc 288300 1 > irq11: atapci1 637852 2 > irq12: vr0 uhci0+ 3890833 15 > irq13: npx0 1 0 > irq14: ata0 54 0 > Total 29947281 119 Hmm.. There seems to be nothing wrong with these numbers. If you were suffering from an interrupt storm I would have expected much larger numbers in the "rate" column. The column "rate" shows the average number of interrupts / second. In total your system handles about 120 interrupts / second, so that shouldn't be a problem. Are you using "powerd" perhaps? Could it be that your system goes into a too deep sleep state where interrupt handling costs significantly more time? grtz, Daan