From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 8 01:59:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A237E16A401 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:59:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas@sanbe-farma.com) Received: from sanbe-farma.com (gwsanbe.sanbe-farma.com [202.6.239.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97DD813C467 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas@sanbe-farma.com) Received: (qmail 10568 invoked by uid 98); 8 Mar 2007 01:32:30 -0000 Received: from 192.168.16.75 by gwsanbe.sanbe-farma.com (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2030. spamassassin: 3.1.6. Clear:RC:1(192.168.16.75):. Processed in 0.048989 secs); 08 Mar 2007 01:32:30 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: thomas@sanbe-farma.com via gwsanbe.sanbe-farma.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(192.168.16.75):. Processed in 0.048989 secs) Received: from tiger-x86.itdept (HELO ?192.168.16.75?) (192.168.16.75) by gwsanbe.sanbe-farma.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2007 01:32:30 -0000 Message-ID: <45EF67A9.9080800@sanbe-farma.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:32:25 +0700 From: Thomas Wahyudi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Johannes References: <20070307170617.GA2799@zen.inc> <45EF2EFF.5080407@tomjudge.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd vpn server behind nat dsl router X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 01:59:16 -0000 Robert Johannes wrote: > As far as openvpn goes, I looked into it in October or Nov. last year, > and it seemed not to be very scalable; I have 6 different offices > that all need to connect and chat with each other, and it didn't seem > like openvpn would allow for this to happen. I didn't investigate it > much beyond that when I learned that. > Hmm i think it should, I have 3 different location, all connected to HQ using openvpn, and all location can talk to each other, just dont use UDP transmission. ( it have a problem ) regards Thomas