From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 21:57:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9573916A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 21:57:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C0643D31 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 21:57:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) iA9LvqWp028156; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:57:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Fernan Aguero In-Reply-To: <20041109204948.GA1732@iib.unsam.edu.ar> References: <20041109204948.GA1732@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-c6Z5hCD8yjQTiFZXiYQP" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:57:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1100037439.17375.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: fixes and comments on the upgrade script procedure X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 21:57:26 -0000 --=-c6Z5hCD8yjQTiFZXiYQP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 17:49 -0300, Fernan Aguero wrote: > Hi! >=20 > I'm running the upgrade script since yesterday ... I hoped > to have it finished by now, but anyway ... since I had > some spare time, and lacking a better thing to > do I decided to read the upgrade script :)=20 >=20 > Attached is a diff with what I think should be corrected. The comment diff is fine, but the other is not needed. You must have downloaded an old version of the script. >=20 > Also, it seems that though not explicitly specified in the > script, the upgrade procedure tried to rebuild openoffice. > This together with mozilla and firefox helps explain the > long time it is taking. Apart from the time issue, what > happened is that the attempt to build OOo made the upgrade > fail when /usr filled up. I never build OOo from sources, > and always use packages. I just don't have the space to > build such a monster. Perhaps it may be possible to perform a > 'dry-run' of the script, just checking what would be done > and thus allow the user to exclude some beasts? Patches are welcome. However, you can also specify portupgrade flags to the script to attempt to upgrade from packages if available. Joe >=20 > Fernan >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=-c6Z5hCD8yjQTiFZXiYQP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBkT0/b2iPiv4Uz4cRAhwYAJ4ovpXYC9WTTago17nYMvNblbCuBwCfXbKk l1/kdLZNM7mJmGOHNSir70M= =N4lI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-c6Z5hCD8yjQTiFZXiYQP--