Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:37:37 -0700 From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, Dirk Meyer <dinoex@freebsd.org>, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org>, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug Message-ID: <D26CD9CD-0296-4A74-9805-DC0F19896E42@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 1 April 2015, at 14:21, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote: >=20 > On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For = example, >>=20 >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405 >>=20 >> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way >> going forward. >=20 > I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only = openssl port. >=20 > If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still = occasionally use base openssl, would you care to explain why you think = so? >=20 > Yuri Some of us don=E2=80=99t use the ports version of openssl because of the = issues with v1.xxx. =20=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D26CD9CD-0296-4A74-9805-DC0F19896E42>