From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 12 20:45:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD1B37B404 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E3C43FA3 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:45:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38ldt5g.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.244.176] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19QfVV-000601-00; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:45:42 -0700 Message-ID: <3EE948A0.F6661BB7@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:44:32 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Knowles References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030612202321.02e28008@194.184.65.4> <20030612193524.GA31199@grumpy.dyndns.org> <3EE8DB83.4040609@potentialtech.com> <200306122006.55906.dkelly@HiWAAY.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4b28056ef2317566d93c8a3461302580aa7ce0e8f8d31aa3f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: chat@FreeBSD.org cc: Bill Moran Subject: Re: Antivirus for (mailservers on) FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 03:45:45 -0000 Brad Knowles wrote: > At 10:16 PM -0400 2003/06/12, Bill Moran wrote: > > while scanning outgoing emails for spam is > > simply a waste of CPU cycles. > > False. You can be held liable (including criminal liability) if > you could have reasonably prevented something like this, and chose > not to. I wish someone would apply this logic to SubSeven and the holes in Windows products that permit it to spread. What, it doesn't apply in that case? Why not? Tell me so I can contrive an example where it doesn't apply to the case you claim it applies to here... -- Terry