From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 30 23:45:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EC0106566B for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8888FC14 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:45:53 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApwEAOmdvE2DaFvO/2dsb2JhbACEUaI+iHGrRY9vgSqDVYEBBI55jj4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,294,1301889600"; d="scan'208";a="120037189" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-jnhn-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2011 19:45:52 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EAFB3F37; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:45:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:45:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Message-ID: <1591833752.819973.1304207152724.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <86iptvg9uo.fsf@ds4.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.201] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - IE7 (Win)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:45:54 -0000 > > This comes from mountcritremote: > > case "`mount -d -a -t nfs 2> /dev/null`" in > *mount_nfs*) > # Handle absent nfs client support > load_kld -m nfs nfsclient || return 1 > ;; > esac > > mount(8) will print "mount_oldnfs" instead of "mount_nfs". Note that > until you flipped the switch, the exact same error would occur, in > reverse, on systems running the new stack. > Yep, I spotted that, but haven`t had a chance to reproduce it and test a fix yet. My first attempt at fixing it will be to change the line to: load_kld -m nfs nfscl ... if that works, I`ll see what the rc folks think is the best fix. > > If you could test a pre-switchover (but recent) client and see if > > the > > message shows up, that would be appreciated. > > It does, so it's not something new. > Ok, thanks for testing it, rick