From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Mar 30 08:26:32 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA27159
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:26:32 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from news.cioe.com (news.cioe.com [204.248.219.34])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA27133
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:26:28 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from steve@news.cioe.com)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by news.cioe.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id LAA10855;
	Mon, 30 Mar 1998 11:27:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 11:27:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Ames <steve@news.cioe.com>
Message-Id: <199803301627.LAA10855@news.cioe.com>
To: joe@via.net, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Quota vs. DU
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


'du' will report the disk usage of all of the files below
the cwd. repquota will only report files that are _owned_ by
the user. So if there are files that exist that are _NOT_ ownbed
by the user than 'du' will report tham and 'repquota' will not.

					-Steve

> Why don't the disk usage numbers reported by repquota and 'du'
> agree?
>
> DU's numbers are significantly larger.
>
> joe
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message