From owner-freebsd-small Tue Apr 24 14:51:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6895E37B422 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:51:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f3OLpcF02538; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:51:38 -0700 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:51:38 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Mark Cc: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is BSD capable?? Message-ID: <20010424145138.B30762@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <002001c0cc6d$be9aee20$8995efd1@quick> <20010423212204.B32567@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <01042421341401.14955@offworld1.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01042421341401.14955@offworld1.net>; from mark@offworld1.net on Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:33:11PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:33:11PM -0400, Mark wrote: > The real application is with 2.4 Ghz wireless radios. They are half duple= x. I > want to take 2 (two) half duplex links, 4 radios total, and have them set= up in > transmit / receive pairs to give me "full duplex" type of operation. If i= t can > be done, it will save me THOUSANDS of dollars ($$$$$$$$$). >=20 > I hope that this clears things up a bit ;-) Much better. ;-) I think this should be doable. I suspect doing something with netgraph and the ng_eiface node. The eiface node would be the virtual interface and it's output would go to the input of the sending card. The output of the recieving card would go to the other one. I think that would work. If I remember my Ethernet basics correctly, it won't work perfectly because of the delay before sending another packet but I think it will work. I am wondering why you want to do this rather then useing Bill Paul's EtherChannel module to bond a couple links since most applications aren't symetric bandwidth users all the time. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D448009+451351+/usr/local/www/= db/text/2001/freebsd-net/20010211.freebsd-net -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE65fVpXY6L6fI4GtQRAk/uAJ9atZ3fojeOWrwZVnvqMWP3nSXCZQCeO8+t Rf3CInvZatw48cONb+o3JGw= =UHeE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message