From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Aug 4 19:12:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EED37B400 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 19:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E785E43E75 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 19:12:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from [198.60.22.200] (helo=mail.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17bXMR-0002Ze-00; Sun, 04 Aug 2002 20:12:43 -0600 Received: from dsl231-050-171.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.231.50.171] helo=xmission.com) by mail.xmission.com with asmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17bXMQ-00072s-00; Sun, 04 Aug 2002 20:12:43 -0600 Message-ID: <3D4DDF1E.3080504@xmission.com> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 20:12:46 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020723 MultiZilla/v1.1.18 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Freeze Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is bitchx port broken? References: <20020804220108.A13472@freeze.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.49.5.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I made bitchx about a week ago without any problems. I update my ports pretty regularly, so try a cvsup and it should work okay.. Jim Freeze wrote: | Hi: | | I tried to compile bitchx and got the following: | | -> cd /usr/ports/irc/bitchx | -> make | |>>ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. |>>Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.bitchx.com/pub/BitchX/source/. |> | Receiving ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz (2533621 bytes): 100% | 2533621 bytes transferred in 36.6 seconds (67.60 kBps) | ===> Extracting for BitchX-1.0c19 | |>>Checksum OK for ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz. |> | ===> BitchX-1.0c19 depends on executable: autoconf - found | ===> BitchX-1.0c19 depends on executable: gmake - found | ===> BitchX-1.0c19 depends on executable: autoconf213 - found | Available switches: | ------------------- | WITH_PLUGINS - Build the plugins | WITH_LATIN - Recommended if you are using an ISO-8859-1 display | WITH_TCL - Build BitchX with TCL scripting | WITH_SOCKS5 - Build BitchX with SOCKS5 support | WITH_IPV6 - Build BitchX with IPV6 support | WITH_GNOME - Build BitchX with Gtk-Frontend | ===> Patching for BitchX-1.0c19 | ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for BitchX-1.0c19 | ===> Configuring for BitchX-1.0c19 | configure.in:5: /usr/local/bin/gm4: Bad expression in eval (bad input): 0 + 13 * 1000 + 2 * 1000000 < 0 + 49b * 1000 + 2 * 1000000 | configure.in:109: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling | autoconf: Undefined macros: | configure.in:11:AC_CONFIG_HEADERS(include/defs.h) | configure.in:68:AC_PROG_CC_STDC | configure.in:8:AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([$srcdir/source/irc.c]) | configure.in:938:AC_CONFIG_FILES([ | configure.in:972:AC_CONFIG_COMMANDS([default],[[ echo timestamp > stamp-h | *** Error code 1 | | Stop in /usr/ports/irc/bitchx. | | I haven't upgraded my ports in about a month. | Is this a bug in ports? Has it been fixed? | | Thanks - -- - -Jason Porter "Real programmers are secure enough to write readable code, which they then self-righteously refuse to explain." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9Td8dYV2rputn/eARAjA2AJ4rsjddncfuzswixiJLan/8U3MM2QCfSvPR Kscx/VHOpA70NzXJdldlUss= =Z2Ob -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message