From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 01:59:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AE81065670 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from araujobsdport@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f17.google.com (mail-qy0-f17.google.com [209.85.221.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E678FC13 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from araujobsdport@gmail.com) Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so2900235qyk.19 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:59:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=mOR8hJiRfaDyQgV3SUpAE8GS+dvTb6fBPir/lDeIc0Y=; b=Pjql0p7c1inrBGQCeEd6TkHZz4v4DFCO+GRbcPysgzSHwu+NOQUsxIP6jZgHvgxDWU qU2Ibt5xATEMf5Rxgnq6X7i1t3qFJzrtx+XvgNRGHW5F6zkqMq+c9CoTsggVCMB/JP80 RgjFP/5s3QZf2NGsZj18GS012AUzcawZnQXy8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; b=Ro2Ki78zOlG3PC91sWz+5eiVrx1SoMUjiqSLwFWpEIkLnsMoa5QkCCWn57aH7VPcaw e7o1rwz0j23Y8VZ/ut/NPxW3l5LfCvIiHKxC5n0uDBVwMA2ikg+gwBIkN9ekWvLHBa92 GGoElj4ujbOV0ErFyi/zyPTvDk2eIs82N3IOI= Received: by 10.214.116.18 with SMTP id o18mr4394201qac.5.1232155962261; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:32:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ponderosa.intelbras.com.br (189.26.129.212.adsl.gvt.net.br [189.26.129.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm5928119yxm.44.2009.01.16.17.32.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:32:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by ponderosa.intelbras.com.br (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:34:09 -0200 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:34:09 -0200 From: Marcelo Araujo To: Erwin Lansing Message-ID: <20090117013409.GA87660@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, pgollucci@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/125243: GNOME Macro (178 Ports) X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:59:15 -0000 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 07:10:55PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote: >=20 > I have no problem with this change, except it needs to wait until after > the slush is lifted. When committed, one, or both, of you should be > standby to fix potential fallout, so I'd suggest scheduling it at at the > start of the day and where you have some time available for the > following few days. Also, as gnome@ maintains most of the affected > ports, I'd suggest running it by them, but I don't see a reason why they > should have a problem with it. All in all, handle it with care but I > see no reason for action by portmgr. Go ahead. Hy guys, About this PR ports/125243, I'd like to run this patch into the CLUSTER to ensure that all are OK before to commit it. I tested this patch, but in anyway I need a double check. PATCH: http://people.freebsd.org/~araujo/logs/gnome.diff I'll need that portmgr approve these modifications. I waiting a reply, thanks. Best Regards, --=20 Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org Never argue with an artist. --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFJcTWQovxJd1Pkz6gRAlN5AJwPn3pTkhEVKwVBz5baQqU33S108gCfYyNZ tWb54sI7YnfYakt/wRkAEWY= =d7Uk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--