From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 19:07:14 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF4C3E1844 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "www.zefox.com", Issuer "www.zefox.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BnT0K4Kstz4Vsq; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08AJ7Nph006002 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:07:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 08AJ7NX8006001; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:07:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 12:07:23 -0700 From: bob prohaska To: Andriy Gapon Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, bob prohaska Subject: Re: MMCCAM - Re: onboard wireless on rpi4 Message-ID: <20200910190723.GA5825@www.zefox.net> References: <1677459627.55.1599232125847@localhost> <75E08DC2-D229-45AA-85AE-CCF06FD0B490@kronometrix.org> <09959D86-E3E3-43E9-8134-C2FC73343DBA@lists.zabbadoz.net> <507782579.41.1599484468967@localhost> <20200907152118.GA89696@www.zefox.net> <40D76B81-934B-43A4-B269-E075D2F4B4CD@lists.zabbadoz.net> <98fb91a8-00e3-4b5c-3b0f-efa2c51388bc@FreeBSD.org> <20200910162452.GA5528@www.zefox.net> <008036a3-bdbf-3ee9-ca21-d445c0867921@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008036a3-bdbf-3ee9-ca21-d445c0867921@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BnT0K4Kstz4Vsq X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fbsd@www.zefox.net has no SPF policy when checking 50.1.20.27) smtp.mailfrom=fbsd@www.zefox.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; WWW_DOT_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.03)[-0.027]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zefox.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.53)[-0.534]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.54)[-0.542]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7065, ipnet:50.1.16.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm]; MID_RHS_WWW(0.50)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:07:14 -0000 On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 09:41:35PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 10/09/2020 19:24, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:36AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> > >> Bob, I noticed this: > >> (sdda0:sdhci_slot0:0:0:0): Partition 0 -> 8265462 > >> > >> Perhaps r365445 might be of some help. > >> > > > > Indeed, moving up to r365459 results in a kernel that boots > > to multi-user. There does seems to be a lot of chatter about > > > > sdda0: SDHC ED4QT 3.0 SN 9B9A5304 MFG 05/2018 by 27 SM > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daopen > > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): daclose > > ..... > > It seems harmless, but certainly looks odd. > > Maybe you have some CAMDEBUG related options in your kernel config? > Or maybe MMCCAM enables some of them -- I haven't checked. > Nothing added/changed by me. If it's debug output that's good, I thought it was some sort of probe or negotiation failure. Thanks for the quick reply! bob prohaska