From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 5 20:53:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BFD106566C for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from regnauld@x0.dk) Received: from moof.catpipe.net (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C9A8FC1E for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) by localhost.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1019C4CEDF3; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:46:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moof.catpipe.net ([194.28.252.64]) by localhost (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L4hoKaJlWOEN; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:46:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from macbook.bluepipe.net (unknown [202.62.123.179]) (Authenticated sender: relayuser) by moof.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 408494CED94; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:46:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by macbook.bluepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 32234D93176; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:45:58 +1200 (FJT) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:45:58 +1200 From: Phil Regnauld To: Pete French Message-ID: <20120705204558.GA2214@macbook.bluepipe.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Darwin 11.4.0 x86_64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommendation for Hyervisor to host FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:53:14 -0000 Pete French (petefrench) writes: > So, my work surprise for a Thursday morning is an urgent requirement to > see if we can run a set of FreeBSD machines under virtualised servers. > I have not done this before personally, but I notice from post here > that it doesnt seem uncommon, and I see Xen related commits flowing > past, so I am guessing it is doable. > > So, for running 8 or 9 STABLE can anyone recommend which hypervisor > works best, and is 8 or 9 better as the OS to run ? Am doing a bit > of research myself, but nothing beats persoanl experience in these > matters! Have been running FreeBSD in production as a hypervisor and a guest under VirtualBox for a couple of years now. Am also running it under Ganeti/XEN and Ganeti/KVM with success. Note other comments in the thread about virtio. Setting KVM to use "native" io also helps quite a bit. Cheers, Phil