From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 22:09:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46E816A4CE; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:09:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA4843D62; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:09:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reso3w83@verizon.net) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.26.84.7]) by out006.verizon.net ESMTP <20050214220931.BKTO28674.out006.verizon.net@ringworm.mechee.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:09:31 -0600 Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8FFE02CE740; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:05:13 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: "Jeremy Messenger" Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:05:12 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1108417167.36205.2.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502141405.13199.reso3w83@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [4.26.84.7] at Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:09:31 -0600 cc: pav@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unmaintained ports [was: Re: Unmaintained ports with fetch errors] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:09:34 -0000 On Monday 14 February 2005 02:01 pm, you wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:39:27 +0100, Pav Lucistnik =20 wrote: > > Michael C. Shultz p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v po 14. 02. 2005 v 13:24 -0800: > >> Mark, I'd love to take over gettext. The way that one is packaged > >> has annoyed me for ages. Do I just submit a PR taking over > >> maintainership or do I wait until someone gives the ok? > > > > Uhh, how exactly you want to change gettext port? I intend to eliminate it running configure in all the subdirectories. > > > > It's one of the core ports, ports such important even no brave > > knight of the round table ever dare to claim maintainership on it Chickens ;) > > ... > > I agree. > > Cheers, > Mezz Well I think I can handle it and I will happily submit changes to anyone who wants to see them for themselves before hand. =2DMike