From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 18 00:08:35 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFF316A41F
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:08:35 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz)
Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A084443D48
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:08:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz)
Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 75D481F87BFD; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:08:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:08:33 +0200
From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20051018000833.GF71766@isis.sigpipe.cz>
Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>,
	ports@FreeBSD.org
References: <20040619021700.GA27883@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20040619111157.GA506@isis.wad.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040619111157.GA506@isis.wad.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Change to INDEX format
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:08:35 -0000

# neuhauser@chello.cz / 2004-06-19 13:11:57 +0200:
> # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-06-18 19:17:00 -0700:
> > This patch extends the format of the INDEX file to separately list
> > FETCH_DEPENDS, EXTRACT_DEPENDS and PATCH_DEPENDS instead of lumping
> > them all together with BUILD_DEPENDS.
> 
>     Do you think this needs to be reflected in the 'search' target in
>     bsd.port.subdir.mk?

    I'm updating Mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk to make searching and display
    of the 11th to 13th field possible, and I have a question: what
    should happen to the default display? Should the F-deps, E-deps,
    P-deps fields be displayed by default?

-- 
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man.  You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE.             http://bash.org/?255991