From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 12 07:47:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA551065678 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from sorbesgroup.com (mail.sorbesgroup.com [217.159.241.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787E08FC18 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sorbesgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272EA3C530D7; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:26:16 +0200 (EET) Received: from sorbesgroup.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sorbesgroup.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13341-04; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:26:15 +0200 (EET) Received: from [192.168.0.80] (andrei [192.168.0.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sorbesgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABF23C530D4; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:26:14 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <49B8BE06.1010105@bsd.ee> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:47:18 +0200 From: Andrei Kolu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daisuke Aoyama , FreeBSD Stable , freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org References: <34849EA9C0D3417C9784824CC0080090@artemis> In-Reply-To: <34849EA9C0D3417C9784824CC0080090@artemis> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost Cc: Subject: Re: Tester wanted for multipath failover iSCSI target software X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:47:19 -0000 Daisuke Aoyama wrote: >> I am interested in giving this a try, though not immediately as I >> am away from the office at the moment. Do I need to apply a patch >> to iscontrol to make it work though ? I can't work it out from your >> statement above. > > Yes, you need. > >> Than ks. Is the intent to integrate with the base system eventually >> rather than have it in ports ? It would be nice to have a native >> implementation which could then be integrated with ZFS. > > istgt is still under development. > so I don't think integration. > before thinking, I should work to fix more bugs. > > I have tested "net/istgt" for couple of days with Windows XP and it works more reliable than NetBSD "net/iscsi-target". With NetBSD implementation sometimes I lost partition filesystem information after disconnecting server from network or rebooting my computer. Is there any particular testcases you want to perform? Tested on FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 11 22:29:33 EET 2009 P.S. Strange, but I can't find istgt in ports anymore...