From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Nov 14 04:42:12 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCFB1109192 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-f178.google.com (mail-it1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A7F8CD87 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:42:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-f178.google.com with SMTP id e11so22011835itl.5 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:42:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zSxDPg5JCDhZ1E9L21ik9q2oIbYNKr5c0+gtQ3AQ6/k=; b=LbPJEjWii0CJbX1jPcIW3HiagU7thRSxMwew56SOpPNTHjx3OhweiNi4H/7cQMU1aC gm0Ao07ngrClujazthcEKgaCyeP+mdBXUXxSh4vk/GnTFNA93CN9kfA+oHTrLQakZa8I zo8nLsmNbVL+LkrgIPxYO2bND4Te1ZuymvNtVNce3gGfa2Bf/eFy2xjDKmXKW3fZ9n4M ZVUNQHXHmGM95bDa3G4GRCbQMkLa9tyEwy6SOSGI17B0WUwMod3EqzDb84FdAvb0sPHA rr5VJX04QFJ+X0QCwulNlv4GRP3mDBmu3StNPFAEIfUns2y64G3jf6eFqnVC6hoJgKHy tJqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJaeLMy9jAhz0u2h2evntKJGDQCPS0atV1iiHwd6bo8w82DsHfE jWkEQ5sQrfGSNU42ZFfTpg8xGNAs X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5deAOZOyKY52y0OLwDe6XkqjxVVjjlCYB+ziFORDs9leWUWjwipI/V2+QfpnnmW7VQ6hBGaOg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:1a44:: with SMTP id 65-v6mr331113jai.50.1542170530361; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:42:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-it1-f182.google.com (mail-it1-f182.google.com. [209.85.166.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i145-v6sm6445452ita.26.2018.11.13.20.42.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:42:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it1-f182.google.com with SMTP id r12-v6so21997998ita.3 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:42:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a24:e4ca:: with SMTP id o193mr677561ith.149.1542170529736; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:42:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2898686.bT80LyP3VS@photon.int.bluestop.org> <2418724.ffieBuXMo3@photon.int.bluestop.org> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:41:58 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: No amdtemp sysctls, acpi errors, AMD Ryzen 5 2400G To: Rebecca Cran Cc: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 52A7F8CD87 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.06 / 200.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.960,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(-1.09)[ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.50), asn: 15169(-1.84), country: US(-0.10)]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[178.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:42:12 -0000 You know what, I wonder if you're running into the CUR_TEMP_RANGE_SEL? I.e., sometimes the CPU chooses to report on a range from 0-225C and sometimes -49C-206C. I think someone else's 2990WX did the same thing. I guess that patch never landed? 102=C2=B0C - 49=C2=B0C is the ver= y reasonable 53=C2=B0C. Yeah, sigh, it never landed: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16855 Ok I'll go ahead and commit that too. Thanks, Conrad On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:38 PM Conrad Meyer wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:29 PM Rebecca Cran wrote= : > > > > On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:17:59 MST Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > > > Maybe it should be -54 instead of +54? 183-(54*2) is the somewhat > > > plausible 75?C (still pretty warm even for load). How good is your > > > cooling solution? > > > > D'oh, of course it's -54 instead of +54 (For some reason I presumed a p= ositive > > offset would be *subtracted*)! I have an all-in-one liquid thermaltak= e > > cooler installed, and under Windows it reports reaching 67C when runnin= g flat > > out, which doesn't seem bad. > > Yeah, 67C seems totally great at load. > > > > (The references I can find with a quick search suggest TR 29xx should > > > also be -27? rather than -54?C, but they may be mistaken. 183-54-27 > > > is still 102?C ? extremely hot!) > > > > That's why I thought 54 was more likely! My 2990WX has 4 units for 32 c= ores > > instead of 2 units and 16 cores for other models, so I guessed that per= haps I > > should double the 27 value other people had said should be used. > > Hm, the Linux folks still use -27 for the 2990WX as well as all of the > other threadripper models. I'm not sure what's right. I wish I had > access to the Ryzen 2 register docs, but I don't. > > Best, > Conrad