From owner-freebsd-doc  Tue Jun 25 10:30:18 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A084637B408
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5PHU3I57285;
	Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200206251730.g5PHU3I57285@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: kern/37127: make in /sys/boot/i386/boot2 and in /sys/boot/i3
Reply-To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-doc.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-doc>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-doc>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/37127; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: Johan Karlsson <k@numeri.campus.luth.se>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/37127: make in /sys/boot/i386/boot2 and in /sys/boot/i3
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:28:45 -0400 (EDT)

 On 25-Jun-2002 Johan Karlsson wrote:
 > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:43 (-0400) +0000, John Baldwin wrote:
 >> 
 >> Looks good.  Actually, you might as well change it to do the
 >> following:
 >> 
 >> # cd /sys/boot/<arch>
 >> # make
 >> # make install
 >> 
 >> To go ahead and install all the various boot blocks.
 > 
 > This does not work (at least not on i386 -stable)
 > since ficl is need to build the loader.
 > 
 > I suggest either
 > 
 ># cd /sys/boot
 ># make
 ># cd /sys/boot/<arch>
 ># make install
 > 
 > or
 > 
 ># cd /sys/boot
 ># make
 ># make install
 
 Right, duh.  This second one is best.  It also has the nice side
 effect of not being as machine-specific.
 
 > On i386 -stable the result is the same but since I'm not
 > sure about other arch I guess the safe thing is to do the
 > first.
 
 Do the second. :)
 
 -- 
 
 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
 "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message