From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 3 08:39:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A1826F for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8C66A8 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r038QmKQ029429; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:26:48 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <50E540C8.2040808@qeng-ho.org> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:26:48 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ASV Subject: Re: just a curiosity about auth.conf References: <1357043607.2063.13.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> In-Reply-To: <1357043607.2063.13.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 08:39:23 -0000 On 01/01/13 12:33, ASV wrote: > Good afternoon and happy new year to everybody. > > I'm just curious about auth.conf. > > According to the detailed release notes > (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/relnotes-detailed.html): > "auth.conf(5) has been removed because it was deprecated years > ago.[r238481]" > > but according to the man pages online AUTH.CONF(5) of FBSD9.0-RELEASE: > "auth.conf contains various attributes important to the authentication > code, most notably crypt(3) for the time being. This documentation will > be updated as the /etc/auth.conf file, which is very new, evolves.". > > How can something deprecated years ago being new and evolving quickly > enough to require further doc updates? Am I missing something? :) Looks like the man page hasn't been updated in a while. If you're not yet on 9.1, and look at auth.conf itself it says in the header comments # Configure some authentication-related defaults. This file is being # gradually subsumed by user class and PAM configuration. I.e. it is/was an old way of doing things that has been replaced by newer mechanisms. Personally I'm glad to see the team clearing out the cruft.