From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 15 05:17:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA22796 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:17:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA22791 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:17:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA14030; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:16:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: shimon@simon-shapiro.org cc: Mark Murray , current@FreeBSD.ORG, "Alok K.Dhir" Subject: Re: ELF Xfree86? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 15 Sep 1998 08:46:55 EDT." Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 05:16:50 -0700 Message-ID: <14026.905861810@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > How about the perl5 port? > > > > Deprecated for current. > > Meaning what? Uhh. Meaning deprecated? :) To turn the question around, why would you personally want perl5 as a port when it was already part of -current? One assumes that it will still stick around in the tree for those 2.2.x users of the -current ports collection (if the system one is enabled by an option in bsd.port.mk, as it is, then that switch can be on/off as necessary in the different branches). - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message