Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Oct 1998 13:42:47 -0700
From:      Studded <Studded@gorean.org>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        The <FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: CVS version updated
Message-ID:  <362E4747.85859BAA@gorean.org>
References:  <362E3E20.D84C354E@gorean.org> <199810212023.OAA27384@mt.sri.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote:
> 
> >       There is a 1.10 release of CVS available, although it apparently has a
> > small bug related to CVSROOT with a trailing slash. We may want to
> > consider an upgrade at some point in the near future however because
> > according to cyclic there are known Y2K bugs in cvs versions < 1.9.27.
> > http://www.cyclic.com/cvs/dev-known.html for more info.
> 
> My spin is that we should wait awhile before doing this.  There are
> *LOTS* of changes w/regard to CVS/Root Handling in the 1.10 branch, and
> I'd like to see them shaken out a while longer.

	No sweat at all. Sounds like you're more in tune with it than I am. I
was doing one of my periodic "poking around" sessions today and thought
I'd bring it up. 

> I'm using CVS 1.9.28 with very good luck at work if the Y2K stuff is
> really bothering someone.

	The projects position as represented on our web page is that we fix Y2K
problems as we find them, so my vote would be to use the most recent
stable CVS version that fixes the Y2K problems. 

Thanks,

Doug
-- 
***           Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network          ***

    Go PADRES!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?362E4747.85859BAA>