From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 1 22:56:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC2416A46C for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from keltia.freenix.fr (keltia.freenix.org [IPv6:2001:660:330f:f820:213:72ff:fe15:f44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E738A13C4CE for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix/TLS) with ESMTP id A3B083BD17 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 23:56:25 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keltia.freenix.fr Received: from keltia.freenix.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keltia.freenix.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5musM+q+G6SL for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 23:56:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix/TLS, from userid 101) id 00BB03AD89; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 23:56:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 23:56:22 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080201225622.GA20139@keltia.freenix.fr> References: <78cb3d3f0801302245v2183c613t6ecdd9acebbe9ef7@mail.gmail.com> <20080131110237.06860561@mbook.mired.org> <78cb3d3f0802011434p5bed2b1ex39320962f0bc8bf5@mail.gmail.com> <20080201174850.54fb9dab@bhuda.mired.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080201174850.54fb9dab@bhuda.mired.org> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / Macbook Pro - FreeBSD 6.2 / Dell D820 SMP User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: [OT] Q: what would you choose for a VCS today X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:56:28 -0000 According to Mike Meyer: > If the only thing preventing that was their OSS license terms, I'd be > surprised if they wouldn't at least consider relaxing them for > FreeBSD. Perforce has already been thought as a replacement (back in 2000 when p4 was introduced) but it will not be able to deal with ports and even on projects right now, we have issues with too many client views/changesets. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr Darwin sidhe.keltia.net Version 8.10.1: Wed May 23 16:33:00 PDT 2007 i386