From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 13:50:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91236FB0; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martymac@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lmtp.galacsys.net (webmail.galacsys.net [IPv6:2001:1b78:0:1:d918:51d7:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B7520EE; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from martymac.org (webmail.galacsys.net [217.24.81.215]) by lmtp.galacsys.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A1A1FA5DC4; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:50:17 +0100 (CET) From: "Ganael LAPLANCHE" To: Mathieu Arnold , Ganael LAPLANCHE , Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r332820 - head/archivers/par2cmdline X-Openwebmail-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:50:17 +0200 Message-Id: <20131106134809.M33241@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <09447C7C5A28CEA547433EE4@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201311050813.rA58Dx1d073265@svn.freebsd.org> <8CC47BFA1B6ED1DA41489582@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20131106073557.M24176@FreeBSD.org> <09447C7C5A28CEA547433EE4@atuin.in.mat.cc> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.01 20030425 X-OriginatingIP: 157.99.64.43 (ganael.laplanche@martymac.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:50:18 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:50:18 -0000 On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:59:49 +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote > Yes and no, it is the current behavior with staging to always > stage docs when generating it is not to heavy, so that when > subports come, the -docs subport can be created without > changing the port. Oh, yes, I was forgetting the future -doc ports. > And I agree, check-orphans should see these > files and shut up :-) :) Thanks for your answer, I'll fix my ports regarding DOCS installation ASAP. Best regards, -- Ganael LAPLANCHE http://www.martymac.org | http://contribs.martymac.org FreeBSD: martymac , http://www.FreeBSD.org