Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:01:12 +0800 From: Denny Lin <dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> To: Matthew Tippett <matthew@phoronix.com> Cc: Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Michael Larabel <Michael@phoronix.com>, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server Message-ID: <20120105100112.GB47282@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <4F04E626.5040406@phoronix.com> References: <CACqU3MXz-vCt8Agkq=z7zyr7ptMgthRBsETxyaFQahX9X1uzPg@mail.gmail.com> <20120104223158.911B11065678@hub.freebsd.org> <20120104184910.0d604240@kan.dyndns.org> <4F04E626.5040406@phoronix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:52:06PM -0800, Matthew Tippett wrote: > Hmm... No sure what happened there again. What I sent (pulled from my > "Sent" folder... > === > > Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking on > Phoronix.com <http://Phoronix.com>, Michael invariable leaves it in the > default configuration 'in the way the developers or vendor wanted it for > production'. This is by rule. A quick question: why is ZFS used in the benchmark? "Both operating systems were in their stock configuration aside from FreeBSD 9.0 using ZFS." UFS is the default on FreeBSD, not ZFS. FreeBSD was not left in the default configuration. -- Denny Lin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120105100112.GB47282>