From owner-freebsd-current Thu Nov 9 14: 5:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-206-90-77.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.206.90.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F6837B4C5 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eA9MB4903552; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:11:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200011092211.eA9MB4903552@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Garrett Wollman Cc: Bruce Evans , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Interrupt allocation In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 11:01:06 EST." <200011091601.LAA06059@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 14:11:04 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Timesharing requires co-operation from both device and bus, but this > is a completely different issue. No drivers currently support > timesharing. `sio' at a minimum probably should, as it was the > motivating example for adding that feature. (My laptop has three PnP > sio ports: an internal modem, an external DB-9, and a dual-ported > infrared transceiver. There are only two interrupts available among > them.) They are probably x-bus parts and would support shared interrupts. 8) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message