From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Aug  2 09:46:58 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA15903
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 09:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA15898
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 09:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA20880; Fri, 2 Aug 1996 09:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Automatic port generation 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Aug 1996 10:39:42 MDT."
             <199608021639.KAA02803@rover.village.org> 
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 1996 09:45:48 -0700
Message-ID: <20878.839004348@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> While I agree with this approach, in general, I'd rather have a quick
> and dirty hack for a makeports with continuing work to make it elegant
> than have to wait for the elegant makeports down the line.

Well, I never said that a "prototype" was out of the question.. ;)

					Jordan